Former Greenpeace leader disputes allegations by Dakota Access Pipeline developer
Annie Leonard, who led Greenpeace USA from 2014 to 2023, told jurors that Greenpeace only got involved in the protests ...
The Associated Press on MSN7 天
Trial begins in $300M lawsuit against Greenpeace over North Dakota pipeline protests
The case is tied to protests in 2016 and 2017 of the Dakota Access Pipeline and its controversial Missouri River crossing ...
North Dakota Supreme Court denies petition to move Greenpeace trial out of Morton County
The Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a petition by Greenpeace to move its legal battle with Energy Transfer out of Morton ...
KVRR11 天
Greenpeace asks North Dakota Supreme Court to move Dakota Access Pipeline trial to Fargo
Exterior of the Morton County Courthouse in Mandan on Feb. 27, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)MANDAN, N.D.
Media petition North Dakota Supreme Court for expanded access to Greenpeace trial
A coalition of media organizations, including the North Dakota Monitor, petitioned the state Supreme Court Thursday seeking expanded access to the trial involving the Dakota Access Pipeline developer ...
Testimony wraps up in Greenpeace trial with jury expected to get case early next week
A jury of nine early next week will decide the $300 million case accusing Greenpeace of concocting a scheme to undermine the ...
The New York Times13 天
A Tough Start for Greenpeace in Court Fight With Pipeline Giant
Lawyers for Greenpeace said so themselves in a petition filed in North Dakota’s Supreme Court. They asked the court on Thursday to move the trial out of Morton County, arguing the jury is not ...
The Roundup10 天
Energy Transfer, Greenpeace Outline Arguments As $300M Trial Starts In North Dakota
Mary Steurer, North Dakota Monitor, northdakotamonitor.com An attorney representing the developer of the Dakota Access ...
NJ.com7 天
Trial begins in $300M lawsuit against Greenpeace over North Dakota pipeline protests
26 at trial that he will prove various Greenpeace entities coordinated delays and disruptions of a controversial oil pipeline’s construction in North Dakota, and defamed the company to its lenders.